Rhinomanometric Evaluation of Patients with Nasal Obstruction Before and After Nasal Surgery
Al- Anbar Medical Journal,
2021, Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 55-58
AbstractBackground: Nasal obstruction is a common complaint in daily Otolaryngology practice.Rhinomanometric study is an objective tool for the evaluation of nasal obstruction.Objectives: To evaluate whether a correlation exists between the rhinomanomatric measurementof nasal resistance, nasal airflow, and the subjective sensation of airflow, pre and postoperatively.Materials and methods: This study was conducted in the Otolaryngology Department at BasrahTeaching Hospital on 23 patients who prepared for nasal surgeries to improve their nasal obstructioncomplain. The study was covered the period of the 2004 year. The anterior rhinomanometry wasdone for all patients preoperatively (with and without decongestant) and post-operatively withoutdecongestant.Results: Out of 23 patients, 15 (65.2%) were males. The age ranged from 17 to 45 years witha mean of 25.5 years ± 7.019. The most common associated symptom with nasal obstructionwas rhinorrhea (n=15, 65.2%). Only 12 cases were attended by the postoperative evaluation.Three-quarters of them were showed clinical improvement, but 4 patients (34%) were showedrhinomanometric improvement (P-value = 0.002). There was no statistically significant differencebetween the pre- and postoperative rhinomanometric values without decongestant and the subjective sensation (P-value>0.05).Conclusion: The anterior rhinomanometry results didn't add a significant value to the clinicalevaluation of the patients with nasal obstruction.
 H. Lara-S ́anchez, C. ́A. Nu ̃no, E. G.-C. Sa ̃nudo, A. M.
Iscar, and L. ́A. V. Valdezate.Assessment of nasal ob-
struction with rhinomanometry and subjective scales and
outcomes of surgical and medical treatment.Acta Otor-
rinolaringol, 68(3):145–150, 2017.
 J. J. Yepes-Nu ̃nezet al.Assessment of nasal obstruction:
correlation between subjective and objective techniques.
Allergol. Immunopathol. (Madr), 41(6):397–401, 2013.
 D. Widiarni,W. W. Paramyta,R. S. Wardani,and
A. Bachtiar. Comparison of nasal obstruction symptom
evaluation, peak nasal inspiratory flowmeter, and rhinomanometry in patients with nasal deformities.Journal
of Physics: Conference Series, 1073(2):22024, 2018.
 S. Brescovici and R. Roithmann. Modified glatzel mirror
test reproducibility in the evaluation of nasal patency.
Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol, 74(2):215–222, 2008.
 S. Canakcioglu, R. Tahamiler, G. Saritzali, H. Isildak,
and Y. Alimoglu. Nasal patency by rhinomanometry in
patients with sensation of nasal obstruction.Am. J. Rhi-
nol. Allergy, 23(3):300–302, 2003.
 D. Demirbas, C. Cingi, H. Cakli, and E. Kaya.Use of
rhinomanometry in common rhinologic disorders.Expert
Rev. Med. Devices, 8(6):769–777, 2011.
 A. I. Mendes, G. F. Wandalsen, and D. Sol ́e. Objective
and subjective assessments of nasal obstruction in chil-
dren and adolescents with allergic rhinitis.J. Pediatr.
(Rio. J), 88(5):389–395, 2012.
 L. Shemen and R. Hamburg. Preoperative and postoper-
ative nasal septal surgery assessment with acoustic rhi-
nometry.Otolaryngol. Neck Surg., 117(4):338–342, 1997.
 J. F. Pallanch, T. V Mccaffrey, and E. B. Kern. Evalu-
ation of nasal breathing function with objective airway
testing. u:Cummings cw; fredrickson jm; harker al la
[ur.].Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surgery, St. Louis, MO
Mosby-Year Book, 1998.
 R. Roithmann, P. Cole, J. Chapnik, S. M. Barreto, J. P.
Szalai, and N. Zamel. Acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanom-
etry, and the sensation of nasal patency:a correlative
study.J. Otolaryngol., 23(6):454–458, 1994.
 P. A. R. Clement. Rhinomanometry.Allergy, 52(26-27),
 T. W. Guyette and B. E. Smith.Effect of septal per-
forations on measures of nasal resistance.Cleft palate-
craniofacial J., 34(2):129–134, 1997.
 C. S. Kim, B. K. Moon, D. H. Jung, and Y.-G. Min. Cor-
relation between nasal obstruction symptoms and objec-
tive parameters of acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanom-
etry.Auris Nasus Larynx, 25(1):45–48, 1998.
 J. Sipil ̈a, J. Suonp ̈a ̈a, P. Silvoniemi, and P. Laippala.
Correlations between subjective sensation of nasal pa-
tency and rhinomanometry in both unilateral and total
nasal assessment.ORL, 57(5):260–263, 1995.
 P. B. Dinis and H. Haider. Septoplasty: long-term evalu-
ation of results.Am. J. Otolaryngol., 23(2):85–90, 2002.
 M. H. Dadgarnia, M. H. Baradaranfar, and M. Mazidi.
Assessment of septoplasty effectiveness using acoustic
rhinometry and rhinomanometry.Iran. J. Otorhino-
laryngol., 25(2):71, 2013.
- Article View: 28
- PDF Download: 27